Erector spinae plane block did not improve postoperative pain-related outcomes and recovery after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery : a randomised controlled double-blinded multi-center trial.

INTRODUCTION: There is a sizable niche for a minimally invasive analgesic technique that could facilitate ambulatory video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Our study aimed to determine the analgesic potential of a single-shot erector spinae plane (ESP) block for VATS. The primary objective was the total hydromorphone consumption with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) 24 h after surgery. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled, double-blind study with patients scheduled for VATS in two major university-affiliated hospital centres. We randomized 52 patients into two groups: a single-shot ESP block using bupivacaine or an ESP block with normal saline (control). We administered a preoperative and postoperative (24 h) quality of recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire and assessed postoperative pain using a verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) score. We evaluated the total standardized intraoperative fentanyl administration, total postoperative hydromorphone consumption (PCA; primary endpoint), and the incidence of adverse effects. RESULTS: There was no difference in the primary objective, hydromorphone consumption at 24 h (7.6 (4.4) mg for the Bupivacaine group versus 8.1 (4.2) mg for the Control group). Secondary objectives and incidence of adverse events were not different between the two groups at any time during the first 24 h following surgery. CONCLUSION: Our multi-centre randomized, controlled, double-blinded study found no advantage of an ESP block over placebo for VATS for opioid consumption, pain, or QoR-15 scores. Further studies are ongoing to establish the benefits of using a denser block (single-shot paravertebral with a continuous ESP block), which may provide a better quality of analgesia.

Comparación entre dosis bajas de bupivacaína y prilocaína en cirugía perianal ambulatoria / Comparison between low doses of bupivacaine and prilocaine in ambulatory perianal surgery

La cirugía perianal ambulatoria se caracteriza por necesitar un plano anestésico profundo durante un periodo de tiempo corto. El bloqueo subaracnoideo en silla de montar consigue una anestesia sensitiva intensa sin apenas bloqueo motor asociado. Los anestésicos locales de larga duración, como la bupivacaína, permiten en dosis bajas la realización del procedimiento y el alta hospitalaria en un tiempo acorde con la dinámica de la unidad cirugía mayor ambulatoria (UCMA). La prilocaína es un anestésico local de vida media intermedia que se caracteriza por su bajo riesgo de síntomas neurológicos transitorios y que se puede usar a dosis de 10 mg en anestesia espinal en silla de montar para la realización de cirugía perianal de menos de 45 min de duración. La hipótesis planteada es que la prilocaína, al ser un anestésico de vida media más corta que la bupivacaína, proporciona un bloqueo suficiente para la realización de un procedimiento estándar de cirugía anorrectal, acortando la estancia en la UCMA. Este estudio prospectivo, a doble ciego de 100 pacientes ASA I-III, divididos en 2 grupos aleatorios: Grupo P (10 mg de prilocaína hiperbárica 20 % + 10 μg de fentanilo) y grupo B (2,5 mg bupivacaina hiperbárica 0,5 % + 10 μg de fentanilo), donde medimos como objetivo principal el tiempo desde la realización de la técnica anestésica hasta el alta hospitalaria. Y como secundarios: el éxito del bloqueo, el tiempo desde el final de la cirugía hasta el alta hospitalaria, el tiempo de regresión del bloqueo sensitivo/motor, el tiempo hasta deambulación, la retención de orina y los efectos adversos.(AU)

Ambulatory perianal surgery is characterized by the need for a deep anesthetic plane for a short period of time. The subarachnoid saddle block achieves intense sensory anesthesia with almost no associated motor blockade. Long-acting local anesthetics, such as bupivacaine, allow the procedure to be performed at low doses and discharge from the hospital in a time that is consistent with the dynamics of the major outpatient surgery unit (MOSU). Prilocaine is a local anesthetic with an intermediate half-life that is characterized by its low risk of transient neurological symptoms and can be used at a dose of 10 mg in saddle spinal anesthesia for perianal surgery of less than 45 min duration. The hypothesis put forward is that prilocaine, being a shorter half-life anesthetic than bupivacaine, provides sufficient blockade for the performance of a standard anorectal surgery procedure, shortening the stay in the AMCU. This prospective, double-blind study of 100 ASA I-III patients, divided into 2 randomized groups: group P (10 mg hyperbaric prilocaine 20 % + 10 μg of fentanyl) and group B (2.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5 % + 10 μg of fentanyl), where we measured as primary objective the time from the performance ofthe anesthetic technique to hospital discharge. And as secondary objectives: success of the block, time from the end of surgery to hospital discharge, time of regression of the sensory/motor block, time to ambulation, urine retention and adverse effects.(AU)

Estudio in vitro de elución de anestésicos locales en cemento óseo de PMMA / In vitro elution of local anesthetics from PMMA bone cement

Antecedentes y objetivo:Actualmente, no disponemos de un gold standard para el manejo del dolor postoperatorio tras una artroplastia total de rodilla, dado que se pueden administrar analgésicos a través de diferentes vías y ninguna de estas está exenta de riesgos. El sistema ideal de administración de analgésicos debería proporcionar dosis terapéuticas, no tóxicas, en el sitio quirúrgico, especialmente durante las primeras 72h. El cemento óseo utilizado en las artroplastias se ha usado como un medio de liberación de fármacos, especialmente antibióticos, desde 1970. Basado en este principio, se desarrolló este estudio con el objetivo de conocer el perfil de elución de dos anestésicos locales (hidrocloruro de lidocaína e hidrocloruro de bupivacaína) desde el cemento óseo de polimetilmetacrilato (PMMA). Material y métodos: Se obtuvieron especímenes de cemento óseo Palacos® R+G e hidrocloruro de lidocaína o hidrocloruro de bupivacaína según el grupo de estudio. Estos especímenes se sumergieron en PBS (por sus siglas en inglés de phosphate buffered saline) y se retiraron de la solución en diferentes cortes temporales establecidos. Posteriormente, se analizó la concentración de anestésico local en el líquido mediante cromatografía líquida. Resultados: El porcentaje de lidocaína eludida del cemento óseo PMMA de este estudio ha sido del 9,74% del contenido total de lidocaína por espécimen a las 72h y del 18,73% a las 336h (14 días). En el caso de la bupivacaína, el porcentaje de elución ha sido del 2,71% del contenido total de bupivacaína por espécimen a las 72h y del 2,70% a las 336h (14 días). Conclusiones: Los anestésicos locales eluyen in vitro desde el cemento óseo, alcanzando a las 72h dosis cercanas a las dosis utilizadas en bloqueos anestésicos.(AU)

Background and aim: Currently, we do not have a gold standard for pain management after total knee arthroplasty. We may use one of more drug delivery systems, none of which are ideal. An ideal depot delivery system would provide therapeutic, nontoxic, doses of drug at the surgical side, especially during 72h postoperatively. The bone cement used in arthroplasties has been used as a drug delivery system, especially antibiotics, since 1970. Based on this principle, we developed this study with the aim to characterize the elution profile of two local anesthetics (lidocaine hydrochloride and bupivacaine hydrochloride) from PMMA (polymethilmethacrylate) bone cement. Material and methods: Palacos® R+G bone cement and lidocaine hydrochloride or bupivacaine hydrochloride specimens were obtained depending on the study group. These specimens were immersed in PBS (phosphate buffered saline) and removed from the solution at different set times. Subsequently, the concentration of local anesthetic in the liquid was analyzed by liquid chromatography. Results: The percentage of lidocaine eluted from PMMA bone cement in this study was 9.74% of the total lidocaine content per specimen at 72h and 18.73% at 336h (14 days). In case of bupivacaine, the elution percentage was 2.71% of the total bupivacaine content per specimen at 72h and 2.70% at 336h (14 days). Conclusions: Local anesthetics elute in vitro from PMMA bone cement, reaching doses at 72h close to the doses used in anesthetic blocks.(AU)

[Translated article] In vitro elution of local anaesthetics from PMMA bone cement / Estudio in vitro de elución de anestésicos locales en cemento óseo de PMMA

Antecedentes y objetivo:Actualmente, no disponemos de un gold standard para el manejo del dolor postoperatorio tras una artroplastia total de rodilla, dado que se pueden administrar analgésicos a través de diferentes vías y ninguna de estas está exenta de riesgos. El sistema ideal de administración de analgésicos debería proporcionar dosis terapéuticas, no tóxicas, en el sitio quirúrgico, especialmente durante las primeras 72h. El cemento óseo utilizado en las artroplastias se ha usado como un medio de liberación de fármacos, especialmente antibióticos, desde 1970. Basado en este principio, se desarrolló este estudio con el objetivo de conocer el perfil de elución de dos anestésicos locales (hidrocloruro de lidocaína e hidrocloruro de bupivacaína) desde el cemento óseo de polimetilmetacrilato (PMMA). Material y métodos: Se obtuvieron especímenes de cemento óseo Palacos® R+G e hidrocloruro de lidocaína o hidrocloruro de bupivacaína según el grupo de estudio. Estos especímenes se sumergieron en PBS (por sus siglas en inglés de phosphate buffered saline) y se retiraron de la solución en diferentes cortes temporales establecidos. Posteriormente, se analizó la concentración de anestésico local en el líquido mediante cromatografía líquida. Resultados: El porcentaje de lidocaína eludida del cemento óseo PMMA de este estudio ha sido del 9,74% del contenido total de lidocaína por espécimen a las 72h y del 18,73% a las 336h (14 días). En el caso de la bupivacaína, el porcentaje de elución ha sido del 2,71% del contenido total de bupivacaína por espécimen a las 72h y del 2,70% a las 336h (14 días). Conclusiones: Los anestésicos locales eluyen in vitro desde el cemento óseo, alcanzando a las 72h dosis cercanas a las dosis utilizadas en bloqueos anestésicos.(AU)

Background and aim: Currently, we do not have a gold standard for pain management after total knee arthroplasty. We may use one of more drug delivery systems, none of which are ideal. An ideal depot delivery system would provide therapeutic, nontoxic, doses of drug at the surgical side, especially during 72h postoperatively. The bone cement used in arthroplasties has been used as a drug delivery system, especially antibiotics, since 1970. Based on this principle, we developed this study with the aim to characterize the elution profile of two local anesthetics (lidocaine hydrochloride and bupivacaine hydrochloride) from PMMA (polymethilmethacrylate) bone cement. Material and methods: Palacos® R+G bone cement and lidocaine hydrochloride or bupivacaine hydrochloride specimens were obtained depending on the study group. These specimens were immersed in PBS (phosphate buffered saline) and removed from the solution at different set times. Subsequently, the concentration of local anesthetic in the liquid was analyzed by liquid chromatography. Results: The percentage of lidocaine eluted from PMMA bone cement in this study was 9.74% of the total lidocaine content per specimen at 72h and 18.73% at 336h (14 days). In case of bupivacaine, the elution percentage was 2.71% of the total bupivacaine content per specimen at 72h and 2.70% at 336h (14 days). Conclusions: Local anesthetics elute in vitro from PMMA bone cement, reaching doses at 72h close to the doses used in anesthetic blocks.(AU)

Comparison of the effects of one-level and bi-level pre-incisional erector spinae plane block on postoperative acute pain in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery; a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.

BACKGROUND: This prospective, randomized, double-blind trial aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of One-Level pre-incisional erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and Bi-Level pre-incisional ESPB in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). METHODS: This pilot trial was conducted between April 2022 and February 2023 with sixty patients. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. In One-Level ESPB Group (n = 30) block was performed at the thoracal(T)5 level with the 30 ml 0.25% bupivacaine. In the Bi-Level ESPB Group (n = 30) block was performed at T4 and T6 levels by using 15 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine for each level. In the postoperative period, 50 mg dexketoprofen every 12 h and 1 g paracetamol every 8 h were given intravenously (IV). Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) prepared with morphine was applied to the patients. 0.5 mg/kg of tramadol was administered via IV for rescue analgesia. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded in the postoperative 1st, 2nd, 4th, 12th, 24th, and 48th -hours. The need for additional analgesics and side effects were recorded. In two groups, patients' demographics and postoperative hemodynamic data were recorded. RESULTS: VAS scores at resting were statistically significantly higher at the 1st (p: 0.002) and 4th -hour (p: 0.001) in the One-Level ESPB. When the groups were evaluated in terms of VAS coughing scores, the 4th -hour (p: 0.001) VAS coughing scores results were found to be statistically significantly higher in the One-Level ESPB group. In terms of VAS values evaluated during follow-up, the rates of VAS coughing score > 3 values were found to be statistically significantly lower in the Bi-Level ESPB group (p: 0.011). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of side effects, morphine consumption, and additional analgesic use (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Adequate analgesia was achieved in the early postoperative period in the group treated with Bi-Level ESPB with similar morphine consumption and side effects. This may be an advantage, especially in the early postoperative period when the pain is quite intense.

Qualitative Histologic Assessment vs. Geomorphometric Analysis of Nerve Fiber Shape after the Intraneural Application of Liposomal Bupivacaine / Evaluación Histológica Cualitativa Versus Análisis Geomorfométrico de la Forma de la Fibra Nerviosa Después de la Aplicación Intraneural de Bupivacaína Liposomal

SUMMARY: The preserved form of all components of the nerve fiber is a prerequisite for the proper conduction of the nerve impulse. various factors can change the shape of nerve fibers. In everyday practice, qualitative histological analysis is the gold standard for detecting changes in shape. Geometric morphometry is an innovative method that objectively enables the assessment of changes in nerve fibers' shape after local anesthetics action. A total of sixty sciatic nerves were used as material, which was intraneural injected with saline solution in the control group (n=30), and a solution of 1.33 % liposomal bupivacaine (n=30) in the test group. After the animals were sacrificed, nerve samples were taken and histological preparations were made. The preparations were first described and examined using a qualitative histological method, after which digital images were made. The images were entered into the MorphoJ program and processed using the method of geometric morphometry. Qualitative histological examination revealed no differences in nerve fibers after intraneurally applied physiological solution and liposomal bupivacaine. Using the method of geometric morphometry, a statistically significant change in the shape of axons was found after intraneurally applied saline solution and liposomal bupivacaine (p=0.0059). No significant differences in histological changes were found after the qualitative histological analysis of nerve fiber cross-section preparations. A statistically significant change in the shape of nerve fiber axons was observed after geometric morphometric analysis of digital images after intraneural application of saline and liposomal bupivacaine.

La forma conservada de todos los componentes de la fibra nerviosa es un requisito previo para la conducción correcta del impulso nervioso. Varios factores pueden cambiar la forma de las fibras nerviosas. En la práctica diaria, el análisis histológico cualitativo es el estándar de oro para detectar cambios de forma. La morfometría geométrica es un método innovador que permite evaluar objetivamente los cambios en la forma de las fibras nerviosas después de la acción de los anestésicos locales. Se utilizó como material un total de sesenta nervios ciáticos, que se inyectaron intraneuralmente con solución salina en el grupo control (n=30), y una solución de bupivacaína liposomal al 1,33 % (n=30) en el grupo de prueba. Después de sacrificados los animales, se tomaron muestras de nervios y se realizaron preparaciones histológicas. Primero se describieron y examinaron las preparaciones utilizando un método histológico cualitativo, después de lo cual se tomaron imágenes digitales. Las imágenes fueron ingresadas al programa MorphoJ y procesadas mediante el método de morfometría geométrica. El examen histológico cualitativo no reveló diferencias en las fibras nerviosas después de la aplicación intraneural de solución fisiológica y bupivacaína liposomal. Usando el método de morfometría geométrica, se encontró un cambio estadísticamente significativo en la forma de los axones después de la aplicación intraneural de solución salina y bupivacaína liposomal (p = 0,0059). No se encontraron diferencias significativas en los cambios histológicos después del análisis histológico cualitativo de las preparaciones de secciones transversales de fibras nerviosas. Se observó un cambio estadísticamente significativo en la forma de los axones de las fibras nerviosas después del análisis de morfometría geométrica de imágenes digitales después de la aplicación intraneural de solución salina y bupivacaína liposomal.

Randomised, prospective, blinded, clinical trial of opioid-free injectable anaesthesia with or without multimodal analgesia in kittens undergoing ovariohysterectomy.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared an opioid-free injectable anaesthetic protocol with or without multimodal analgesia in kittens undergoing ovariohysterectomy. METHODS: In this prospective, randomised, blinded, clinical trial, 29 healthy kittens (mean ± SD weight 1.55 ± 0.46 kg; aged 10 weeks to 6 months) were included. Anaesthesia was performed with an intramuscular injection of ketamine (4 mg/kg), dexmedetomidine (40 µg/kg) and midazolam (0.25 mg/kg). In the multimodal group (MMG), cats (n = 14) received meloxicam (0.1 mg/kg SC) and intraperitoneal bupivacaine 0.25% (2 mg/kg), whereas the same volume of saline was administered in the control group (CG; n = 15). Atipamezole (0.4 mg/kg IM) was given 15 mins after ovariohysterectomy. Postoperative pain was assessed using the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional feline pain assessment scale - short form. Rescue analgesia (buprenorphine 0.02 mg/kg IM in MMG/CG and meloxicam 0.1 mg/kg SC in CG) was administered if pain scores were ⩾4/12. Soft food intake (after 2 and 60 mins) was evaluated at specific time points postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed with linear models and post-hoc pairwise comparison with Benjamini-Hochberg corrections (P <0.05). RESULTS: The prevalence of rescue analgesia was higher in the CG (n = 15/15) than the MMG (n = 1/14; P <0.001). Pain scores at 1 h, 2 h and 4 h postoperatively were higher in the CG (4.1 ± 2.8, 4.8 ± 3.0 and 5.3 ± 1.2, respectively) than in the MMG (1.6 ± 1.0, 1.1 ± 1.0 and 0.9 ± 0.8, respectively; P <0.001). Food intake (%) at 1 h postoperatively was higher in the MMG after 2 and 60 mins (10.4 ± 9 and 71.9 ± 29, respectively) than in the CG (1.4 ± 2 and 13.9 ± 7, respectively; P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This opioid-free protocol using multimodal analgesia produced adequate postoperative pain relief, while almost eliminating the need for rescue analgesia in kittens undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Pain decreased food intake.

Comparative growth dynamics of bacterial and fungal contaminants in bupivacaine liposomal injectable suspension, bupivacaine 0.5%, and propofol.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether bupivacaine liposomal injectable suspension (BLIS) supports microbial growth when artificially inoculated and to evaluate liposomal stability in the face of this extrinsic contamination as evidenced by changes in free bupivacaine concentrations. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, prospective in vitro study in which three vials of each BLIS, bupivacaine 0.5%, and propofol were individually inoculated with known concentrations of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida albicans (n = 36) to quantify bacterial and fungal growth was conducted. Over 120 hours, aliquots from contaminated vials were withdrawn, plated, and incubated to determine microbial concentrations. High-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to evaluate free bupivacaine concentrations over time in BLIS. Data were analyzed using a mixed effects model with multiple comparisons. SAMPLE POPULATION: Twelve vials of each BLIS, bupivacaine 0.5%, and propofol. RESULTS: BLIS did not support significant growth of Staphylococcus aureus or Candida albicans at any time. BLIS supported significant growth of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa beginning at the 24 hour time point. Bupivacaine 0.5% did not support significant growth of any organisms. Propofol supported significant growth of all organisms. Free bupivacaine concentrations changed minimally over time. CONCLUSION: Bacterial and fungal contaminant growth in artificially inoculated BLIS is organism dependent. BLIS supports significant growth of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Extra-label handling of BLIS should only be undertaken with caution and with adherence to strict aseptic technique.

Lipid emulsions attenuate the inhibition of carnitine acylcarnitine translocase induced by toxic doses of local anesthetics in rat cardiomyoblasts.

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of lipid emulsions on carnitine palmitoyltransferase I (CPT-I), carnitine acylcarnitine translocase (CACT), carnitine palmitoyltransferase II (CPT-II), and the mitochondrial dysfunctions induced by toxic doses of local anesthetics in H9c2 rat cardiomyoblasts. The effects of local anesthetics and lipid emulsions on the activities of CPT-I, CACT, and CPT-II, and concentrations of local anesthetics were examined. The effects of lipid emulsions, N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC), and mitotempo on the bupivacaine-induced changes in cell viability, reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), and intracellular calcium levels were examined. CACT, without significantly altering CPT-I and CPT-II, was inhibited by toxic concentration of local anesthetics. The levobupivacaine- and bupivacaine-induced inhibition of CACT was attenuated by all concentrations of lipid emulsion, whereas the ropivacaine-induced inhibition of CACT was attenuated by medium and high concentrations of lipid emulsion. The concentration of levobupivacaine was slightly attenuated by lipid emulsion. The bupivacaine-induced increase of ROS and calcium and the bupivacaine-induced decrease of MMP were attenuated by ROS scavengers NAC and mitotempo, and the lipid emulsion. Collectively, these results suggested that the lipid emulsion attenuated the levobupivacaine-induced inhibition of CACT, probably through the lipid emulsion-mediated sequestration of levobupivacaine.

Synthesis of nanocapsules blended polymeric hydrogel loaded with bupivacaine drug delivery system for local anesthetics and pain management.

Local anesthetics are used clinically for the control of postoperative pain management. This study aimed to develop chitosan (CS) with genipin (GP) hydrogels as the hydrophilic lipid shell loaded poly(ε-caprolactone) (PC) nanocapsules as the hydrophobic polymeric core composites (CS-GP/PC) to deliver bupivacaine (BPV) for the prolongation of anesthesia and pain relief. The swelling ratio, in vitro degradation, and rheological properties enhancement of CS-GP/PC polymeric hydrogel. The incorporation of PC nanocapsules into CS-GP hydrogels was confirmed by SEM, FTIR, and XRD analysis. Scanning electron microscopy results demonstrated that the CS-GP hydrogels and CS-GP/PC polymeric hydrogels have a porous structure, the pore dimensions being non-uniform with diameters between 25 and 300 µm. The in vitro drug release profile of CS-GP/PC polymeric hydrogel has been achieved 99.2 ± 1.12% of BPV drug release in 36 h. Cellular viability was evaluated using the CCK-8 test on 3T3 fibroblast cells revealed that the obtained CS-GP/PC polymeric hydrogel with BPV exhibited no obvious cytotoxicity. The CS-GP/PC polymeric hydrogel loaded with BPV showed significant improvement in pain response compared to the control group animals for at least 7 days. When compared with BPV solution, CS-GP hydrogel and CS-GP/PC polymeric hydrogel improved the skin permeation of BPV 3-fold and 5-fold in 24 h, respectively. In vitro and in vivo results pointed out PC nanocapsules loaded CS-GP hydrogel can act as effective drug carriers, thus prolonging and enhancing the anesthetic effect of BPV. Histopathological results demonstrated the excellent biodegradability and biocompatibility of the BPV-loaded CS-GP/PC polymeric hydrogel system on 7, 14, and 21 days without neurotoxicity.HIGHLIGHTSPreparation and characterization of CS-GP/PC polymeric hydrogel system.BPV-loaded CS-GP/PC exhibited prolonged in vitro release in PBS solution.Cytotoxicity of BPV-loaded CS-GP/PC polymeric hydrogel against fibroblast (3T3) cells.Development of CS-GP/PC a promising skin drug-delivery system for local anesthetic BPV.

Saddle block anesthetic technique for benign outpatient anorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Current American Society of Colorectal Surgery Clinical Practice Guidelines for Ambulatory Anorectal Surgery endorse use of monitored anesthesia care, general anesthesia, or spinal anesthesia based on physician and patient preference. Although several studies support the use of monitored anesthesia care over general anesthesia, the literature regarding spinal anesthesia is limited and heterogenous due to small sample sizes and disparate spinal anesthesia techniques. Saddle block anesthesia is a form of spinal anesthesia that localizes to the lowermost sacral spinal segments allowing for preservation of lower extremity motor function and faster recovery. We accrued one of the largest reported cohort of anorectal procedures using saddle block anesthesia, as such, we sought to evaluate our institutional 12-year experience. METHODS: Patients who underwent a benign anorectal procedure at our outpatient surgery center between July 2008-2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, surgical factors, perioperative times, and adverse events were collected from the electronic medical records. Saddle block anesthesia was generally performed in the preoperative area using a spinal needle (25-27 gauge) and a single injection technique of a 1:1 ratio local anesthetic mixed with 10% dextrose solution. Between 2.5-5 mg of hyperbaric anesthetic was injected intrathecally in the sitting position and the patient remained upright for 3-10 minutes. This technique of saddle block anesthesia provides analgesia for approximately 1-3 hours. RESULTS: In the study, 859 saddle block anesthesia patients were identified, with a mean age of 44.6 years and American Society of Anesthesia score of 1.9; 609 (70.9%) were male. Surgical indications included lesion removal (27.1%), anal fistula (25.8%), hemorrhoidectomy (24.7%), pilonidal disease (6.3%), anal fissure (5.8%), and a combination of prior (10.2%). Prone jackknife positioning was used in 91.6% of procedures. Saddle block anesthesia most often was performed with bupivacaine (48.9%) or ropivacaine (41.7%). The median procedural saddle block anesthesia time was 11 minutes, surgery time was 17 minutes, anesthesia time was 42 minutes, and recovery time was 91 minutes. Patients spent a median of 3 hours and 53 minutes in the facility. Adverse events included urinary retention (1.9%), conversion to general anesthesia (1.8%), spinal headache (1.5%), hemodynamic instability (0.9%), and injection site reaction (0.3%). CONCLUSION: Demonstrated using the largest known cohort of anorectal patients with saddle block anesthesia, saddle block anesthesia provides an effective method of analgesia to avoid general anesthesia with a low rate of adverse events.

Intercostal liposomal bupivacaine injection for rib fractures: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Blunt chest wall injury accounts for 15% of trauma admissions. Previous studies have shown that the number of rib fractures predicts inpatient opioid requirements, raising concerns for pharmacologic consequences, including hypotension, delirium, and opioid dependence. We hypothesized that intercostal injection of liposomal bupivacaine would reduce analgesia needs and improve spirometry metrics in trauma patients with rib fractures. METHODS: A prospective, double-blinded, randomized placebo-control study was conducted at a Level I trauma center as a Food and Drug Administration investigational new drug study. Enrollment criteria included patients 18 years or older admitted to the intensive care unit with blunt chest wall trauma who could not achieve greater than 50% goal inspiratory capacity. Patients were randomized to liposomal bupivacaine or saline injections in up to six intercostal spaces. Primary outcome was to examine pain scores and breakthrough pain medications for 96-hour duration. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the effects of analgesia on pulmonary physiology. RESULTS: One hundred patients were enrolled, 50 per cohort, with similar demographics (Injury Severity Score, 17.9 bupivacaine 17.6 control) and comorbidities. Enrolled patients had a mean age of 60.5 years, and 47% were female. Rib fracture number, distribution, and targets for injection were similar between groups. While both groups displayed a decrease in opioid use over time, there was no change in mean daily pain scores. The bupivacaine group achieved higher incentive spirometry volumes over Days 1 and 2 (1095 mL, 1063 mL bupivacaine vs. 900 mL, 866 mL control). Hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay were similar and there were no differences in postinjection pneumonia, use of epidural catheters or adverse events bet ween groups. CONCLUSION: While intercostal liposomal bupivacaine injection is a safe method for rib fracture-related analgesia, it was not effective in reducing pain scores, opioid requirements, or hospital length of stay. Bupivacaine injection transiently improved incentive spirometry volumes, but without a reduction in the development of pneumonia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, Level II.

Intrathecal 2-Chloroprocaine 3% Versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.75% for Cervical Cerclage: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cerclage is a short ambulatory procedure. For spinal anesthesia, local anesthetic agents with rapid postoperative resolution are desired. We hypothesized that in combination with fentanyl, intrathecal 2-chloroprocaine would produce earlier resolution of motor block, resulting in shorter time to meet recovery room discharge criteria than hyperbaric bupivacaine. METHODS: Women undergoing cervical cerclage with spinal anesthesia were randomized to receive intrathecal 2-chloroprocaine 3% 50 mg or hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.75% 9 mg, both with fentanyl 15 µg. Doses were empirically selected. The onset and resolution of sensory and motor blockade and time to achieve recovery room discharge criteria were monitored. On postoperative day 1, patients rated their satisfaction with the anesthetic and reported on transient neurologic symptoms (TNS), back pain, or headache. The primary outcome was time from spinal injection to motor block resolution. The main secondary outcomes included times from spinal injection to (i) T12 dermatomal level, (ii) sensory block resolution, and (iii) ability to ambulate and void. RESULTS: Forty-three women were enrolled and randomized to either the chloroprocaine (N = 23) or bupivacaine group (N = 20). The mean (standard deviation [SD]) duration of surgery was 35.3 (11.4) minutes. There was no difference between groups for time to motor block resolution-the median [interquartile range] time for the bupivacaine group (N = 17) was 112 [97-143] minutes versus 109 [88-148] minutes in the chloroprocaine group (N = 22), P = .66, but there was a significant difference in median time to sensory block resolution: 143 [116-162] minutes in the chloroprocaine group versus 198 [152-263] minutes in the bupivacaine group, P = .002. The recovery room discharge criteria, which at our institution include the ability to ambulate unassisted and void urine, were met 76 (95% CI, 33-145) minutes earlier in the chloroprocaine group, P < .0005. One complete block failure occurred with hyperbaric bupivacaine and 2 subjects in each group received treatment for intraoperative discomfort. No patients reported TNS. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal 2-chloropocaine 3% provided similarly effective surgical anesthesia for cerclage placement. Although no difference in time to motor block resolution between groups was observed, the time to sensory block resolution and time to meet recovery room discharge criteria were both significantly shorter among patients who received chloroprocaine than patients who received bupivacaine. Future studies are needed to identify and compare equipotent doses of chloroprocaine and bupivacaine to confirm the superiority of chloroprocaine for this ambulatory obstetric procedure.

The Effect of Perianal Tramadol Infiltration on Postoperative Pain Following Hemorrhoidectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The present study was attempted to evaluate the effect of perianal infiltration of tramadol on postoperative pain in patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy. METHOD: This double-blind clinical trial study was carried out on 90 patients with grade 3 and 4 hemorrhoids undergoing hemorrhoidectomy. Patients were randomly assigned into 3 groups of control or bupivacaine or tramadol. Before the surgery, perianal infiltration of .25% bupivacaine or tramadol or normal saline was prescribed to each group, respectively. Data on pain severity (based on the visual analog scale (VAS), the duration of surgery, sedation score, pain at the first defecation, first request time for additional analgesia, nausea and vomiting, and analgesic intakes) were evaluated and analyzed. RESULTS: Duration of surgery was almost similar in all 3 groups (P = .974). The results showed a significant difference in pain score between 3 groups (P ≤.05) at all times after the surgery. In addition, the means of sedation scores (P = .03), pain score at the first defecation (P = .001), the time to first analgesic request (P = .001), and ketorolac administration times (P = .01) were significantly different between 3 groups. Finally, no complication was reported regarding postoperative nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSION: Given the notable efficacy of tramadol in reducing pain after hemorrhoidectomy and its minor side effects, this medication is suggested as an effective topical anesthetic to decrease pain after hemorrhoidectomy.

Peripheral nerve blocks with liposomal bupivacaine are associated with increased opioid use compared to thoracic epidural in patients with an epigastric incision.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic epidurals are commonly recommended in enhanced recovery protocols, though they may cause hypotension and urinary retention. Peripheral nerve blocks using liposomal bupivacaine are a potential alternative, though they have not been extensively studied in major cancer operations with an epigastric incision. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data following the transition from thoracic epidural to liposomal peripheral nerve blocks in patients undergoing major oncologic surgery. Patients receiving peripheral nerve blocks were compared to those receiving thoracic epidural. Outcome variables included postoperative opioid use (milligram morphine equivalents [MME]), severe pain, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Forty-seven of 102 patients studied (46%) received peripheral nerve blocks. Opioid use was higher in the peripheral nerve block group during the 0-24 h (116 vs. 94 MME, p = 0.04) and 24-48 h postoperative period (94 vs. 23 MME, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in severe pain, hypotension, urinary retention, or ileus. Peripheral nerve blocks were associated with earlier ambulation (1 vs. 2 days, p = 0.04), though other milestones were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Liposomal peripheral nerve blocks were associated with increased opioid use compared to thoracic epidural. On the basis of our results, thoracic epidural might be preferred in surgical oncology patients with an epigastric incision.

The use of perineural dexamethasone and transverse abdominal plane block for postoperative analgesia in cesarean section operations under spinal anesthesia: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: During transverses abdominal plane block (TAP) procedure to provide analgesia in cesarean section (CS) operation, the use of perineural dexamethasone as an additive agent may improve pain relief and may cause a prolonged block duration. This study aims to investigate whether perineural dexamethasone, when added to bupivacaine local anesthetic agent during a TAP block, may provide adequate pain relief without adverse events. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of fifty-eight patients undergoing elective CS with spinal anesthesia. We hypothesized to perform bilateral TAP block using perineural dexamethasone as an additive agent. The patients were randomly divided into two groups using a systematic random sampling method. While one group of patients received perineural dexamethasone of 8 mg additive agent together with bupivacaine 0.25% 40 ml (Group TAPD), the other group received only bupivacaine 0.25% 40 ml in TAP block (Group TAPA). The primary outcomes are the period for the first request of postoperative pain relief medication and the numerical rating scale (NRS) pain intensity scores at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes are comparing the 24-h tramadol and diclofenac analgesic requirements and the incidences of side effects on postoperative day one. A p-value of < 0.05 is statistically significant. RESULTS: The time to first analgesic request was 8.5 h (8.39-9.79) in the TAPD group versus 5.3 h (5.23-5.59) in the TAPA group, respectively. (p < 0.001) The median NRS scores were significantly reduced in the TAPD group compared to the TAPA group at 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery (p-values < 0.001). The total analgesics consumption over 24 h postoperatively was lower in Group TAPD compared to Group TAPA (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: An additive agent of perineural dexamethasone at a dose of 8 mg during bilateral TAP block for elective CS operation under spinal anesthesia provided better pain relief on postoperative day 1.

Adding a low-concentration sciatic nerve block to total knee arthroplasty in patients susceptible to the adverse effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the effects of adductor canal blocks with those of a low concentration of popliteal-sciatic nerve block (SNB) and dexamethasone as an adjunctive technique for total knee arthroplasties (TKA) in patients susceptible to the adverse effects of NSAIDs. METHODS: A prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial was performed in 50 patients susceptible to the adverse effects of NSAIDs undergoing unilateral TKAs. All patients received spinal anesthesia, adductor canal blocks, and periarticular infiltration. The 25 patients in the intervention group received SNB (0.125% bupivacaine [20 ml] and dexamethasone [5 mg]). RESULTS: The SNB group significantly had lower median resting pain scores at 6, 12, and 18 h: the control group, 1 (0-4.5), 3 (0-5), and 3 (2-5); the intervention group, 0 (0-0), 0 (0-3), and 1 (0-3); p-values, 0.012, 0.021, and 0.010, respectively. Movement-evoked pain scores at 6, 12, and 18 h were also lower: control group, 3 (0-5.5), 5 (2.5-6.5), and 7 (4-9); intervention group, 0 (0-1.5), 2 (0-4), and 3 (2-5); p-values, 0.019, 0.005, and 0.001, respectively. There were no differences in motor function. Moreover, the mean morphine consumption 24 h was also reduced in the SNB group: control group, 3.80 ± 2.48 mg; intervention group, 1.96 ± 2 mg; p-value, 0.005. CONCLUSION: For patients susceptible to the adverse effects of NSAIDs, a low concentration of SNB and dexamethasone is an effective adjunctive technique for early postoperative pain control (especially on movement) following TKAs, without an increase in motor weakness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03486548 , Registered 3 April 2018.

Defining Enhanced Recovery Pathway with or without Liposomal Bupivacaine in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) includes multiple interventions that have yielded positive outcomes in a number of surgical fields. The authors evaluated whether an ERAS protocol and the subsequent addition of liposomal bupivacaine affect patient outcomes specifically in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. METHODS: All patients treated with DIEP flaps from January of 2016 to December of 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. The ERAS protocol was implemented midway through 2017; halfway through 2018, intraoperative transversus abdominis plane blocks with liposomal bupivacaine were added to the protocol. Such interventions allowed for comparison of three patient groups: before ERAS, during ERAS, and after ERAS plus liposomal bupivacaine. Primary outcomes observed were postoperative opioid consumption and length of stay. The p values were obtained using the Wilcoxon test for pairwise comparisons. RESULTS: After adjusting for ERAS group compliance, 216 patients were analyzed. The pre-ERAS group was composed of 67 patients, the ERAS group was composed of 69 patients, and the ERAS plus liposomal bupivacaine group was composed of 80 patients. Postoperative opioid consumption was reduced when comparing the pre-ERAS and ERAS groups (from 275.7 oral morphine equivalents to 146.7 oral morphine equivalents; p < 0.0001), and also reduced with the addition of liposomal bupivacaine (115.3 oral morphine equivalents; p = 0.016). Furthermore, hospital length of stay was decreased from 3.6 days in the pre-ERAS group to 3.2 days (p = 0.0029) in the ERAS group, and to 2.6 days (p < 0.0001) in the ERAS group plus liposomal bupivacaine groups. CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols decrease postoperative opioid consumption and hospital length of stay in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. The addition of liposomal bupivacaine further strengthens the impact of the protocol. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Comparison of epidural, spinal, and saddle block for holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP): A prospective randomized, comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) has become an important treatment modality for benign prostate hypertrophy. The aim of the present study was to compare regional anesthesia methods for HoLEP operation and to determine the optimal technique. METHODS: Sixty patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists scores of I-III were randomly allocated into 3 groups. Patients in group E received an epidural block with 75 mg of bupivacaine plus 50 µg of fentanyl. In group S, 15 mg of bupivacaine and 50 µg fentanyl were used for spinal anesthesia. In group SA, patients received saddle block with 15 mg of bupivacaine and 50 µg of fentanyl. RESULTS: Time to T10 dermatome block and to maximal level block were longest in group E (P < .05), and maximal sensorial block level was higher in group E than group SA (P < .05). There was a significant difference in postoperative motor block, but no difference in systolic blood pressure and heart rate. CONCLUSION: Among 3 techniques, saddle block might be preferable in HoLEP because an adequate sensorial level was achieved with lower motor block and stable hemodynamics.

Improving Pain Management After Cesarean Birth Using Transversus Abdominis Plane Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine as Part of a Multimodal Regimen.

As educators, advocates, and champions for women's health, nurses play pivotal roles throughout a woman's pregnancy and childbirth journey. Most women experience postsurgical pain after cesarean birth and are prescribed opioids. Caution around opioid use warrants opioid-reducing strategies, particularly because exposure to opioids exacerbates risk for developing persistent postsurgical opioid use. Multimodal approaches can help address this concern. Regional anesthesia using transversus abdominis plane blocks with aqueous formulations of local anesthetics can reduce opioid consumption and pain but has a short duration of action. Liposomal formulation of bupivacaine prolongs its release, overcoming this obstacle. Transversus abdominis plane blocks with liposomal bupivacaine can reduce opioid use and pain after cesarean birth, improving recovery. These findings represent numerous implications for nursing practice to improve postcesarean pain management.